The study is based on rhetorical practices represented in themetaphor of Abdul Qaher Al-Jurjani, and an attempt to re-read it to reveal the argumentative concepts and analytical tools that intersect cognitively with the conceptual construction of Michel Le Guern's perceptions in his specialized thesis: (Metaphor and Arguments); It does not allow confusion and conflict. The nature of the research and its scientific investigations required the adoption of the comparative descriptive approach between two blogs, one of which is rhetorical heritage, represented in the works of Abdul Qaher Al-Jurjani, especially his books "Evidence of Miracles", and "Secrets of Rhetoric", and monitoring theoretical and conceptual perceptions and analyzing applied visions related to the lesson of metaphor arguments in different rhetorical formulas, and comparing it with the description of what came when Michel Le Guern in his research "Metaphor and Arguments " Consider his multiple semantic and functional analyses of texts.
Ali Nour ElDin, H. (2023). Argumentative reasoning for metaphor: a study in the description of Al-Jurjani and Lujern. فيلولوجى: سلسلة الدراسات الأدبية واللغوية, 40(79), 31-54. doi: 10.21608/gsal.2023.302707
MLA
Hoda Ali Nour ElDin. "Argumentative reasoning for metaphor: a study in the description of Al-Jurjani and Lujern", فيلولوجى: سلسلة الدراسات الأدبية واللغوية, 40, 79, 2023, 31-54. doi: 10.21608/gsal.2023.302707
HARVARD
Ali Nour ElDin, H. (2023). 'Argumentative reasoning for metaphor: a study in the description of Al-Jurjani and Lujern', فيلولوجى: سلسلة الدراسات الأدبية واللغوية, 40(79), pp. 31-54. doi: 10.21608/gsal.2023.302707
VANCOUVER
Ali Nour ElDin, H. Argumentative reasoning for metaphor: a study in the description of Al-Jurjani and Lujern. فيلولوجى: سلسلة الدراسات الأدبية واللغوية, 2023; 40(79): 31-54. doi: 10.21608/gsal.2023.302707